Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:11 pm
Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
An added perk to live drafting the Main Event is getting to see the other live draft boards at the completion of the draft. Drafting online this year, I have only my own draft board to look at and the twitter-posted team of Chris Liss, which interests me because he was drafting from the #2 spot like me.
From this mountain of data, there is one very clear 'trend' developing this year with Clayton Kershaw that holds true in all (both) ME Drafts available to me at this point. Both drafters of Kershaw did not take another starting pitcher until they selected Rich Hill on the rounds 8-9 turn.
Laying aside concerns about relying on Hill's 110 IP last year, or his 105 COMBINED IP the previous 6 years, this strategy of taking Kershaw because you don't have to take another ace, and can ignore starting pitching for a considerable portion of the draft is more dangerous than taking Billy Hamilton to avoid needing other high-round SB guys. If Hamilton gets hurt, you drop to the bottom of 1 category. If Kershaw gets hurt, you sink in four categories.
The benefit of this strategy would be that a team taking only Kershaw for starting pitching in the first 8 rounds should be able to get a leg up on hitting across the board. It's a viable strategy to win the overall, but it is a singular path that can absorb little disruption to Kershaw's health or execution.
From this mountain of data, there is one very clear 'trend' developing this year with Clayton Kershaw that holds true in all (both) ME Drafts available to me at this point. Both drafters of Kershaw did not take another starting pitcher until they selected Rich Hill on the rounds 8-9 turn.
Laying aside concerns about relying on Hill's 110 IP last year, or his 105 COMBINED IP the previous 6 years, this strategy of taking Kershaw because you don't have to take another ace, and can ignore starting pitching for a considerable portion of the draft is more dangerous than taking Billy Hamilton to avoid needing other high-round SB guys. If Hamilton gets hurt, you drop to the bottom of 1 category. If Kershaw gets hurt, you sink in four categories.
The benefit of this strategy would be that a team taking only Kershaw for starting pitching in the first 8 rounds should be able to get a leg up on hitting across the board. It's a viable strategy to win the overall, but it is a singular path that can absorb little disruption to Kershaw's health or execution.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Well said.knuckleheads wrote:An added perk to live drafting the Main Event is getting to see the other live draft boards at the completion of the draft. Drafting online this year, I have only my own draft board to look at and the twitter-posted team of Chris Liss, which interests me because he was drafting from the #2 spot like me.
From this mountain of data, there is one very clear 'trend' developing this year with Clayton Kershaw that holds true in all (both) ME Drafts available to me at this point. Both drafters of Kershaw did not take another starting pitcher until they selected Rich Hill on the rounds 8-9 turn.
Laying aside concerns about relying on Hill's 110 IP last year, or his 105 COMBINED IP the previous 6 years, this strategy of taking Kershaw because you don't have to take another ace, and can ignore starting pitching for a considerable portion of the draft is more dangerous than taking Billy Hamilton to avoid needing other high-round SB guys. If Hamilton gets hurt, you drop to the bottom of 1 category. If Kershaw gets hurt, you sink in four categories.
The benefit of this strategy would be that a team taking only Kershaw for starting pitching in the first 8 rounds should be able to get a leg up on hitting across the board. It's a viable strategy to win the overall, but it is a singular path that can absorb little disruption to Kershaw's health or execution.
It is hard to start a team with Kershaw.
I did so in a couple of DC leagues. There is that trap of wanting to load up on hitting for the next few draft slots.
Kershaw now has an injury history. It is something that his drafters just have to take into consideration.
And worse, it is a back condition and nobody comes back from back injuries quickly during the season.
When drafting Kershaw in the second draft, I wrote down Jake Arrieta's name.
In this way, for the rest of the draft, I still knew I had an ace, but not a pitcher that I was going to wholely (made up word) rely upon.
That helped a lot.
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
I'd take Kershaw 1 overall. I frequently own Andrew Miller and Dallas Keuchel as my next pitchers just because of when it is next worth it to take a pitcher. If I take a SP in first round I wouldn't again until at least round 5 but wouldn't purposely wait until those Rich Hill folks do, I don't really get that.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Meh, if your first round busts, you have a problem no matter what. I had that last year but had it good with Mookie Betts, et al. Whether you put one category in one basket or several, you still have to make up a ton. In a sense it's easier to lose Hamilton (as I also did last year) because you know you need to find one thing instead of everything.
But I think you draft to your strengths. Kershaw is the most valuable player if he's healthy and himself. Yes, more so than Trout. However, my hitting list is similar to everyone else's. My pitching is very different, though; come season's end, in testing my projections are about as accurate as those publicly available. That means I can find treasure in pitching but less so in hitting so I'm never going Kershaw first round. I can find pitching but *need* hitting.
But I think you draft to your strengths. Kershaw is the most valuable player if he's healthy and himself. Yes, more so than Trout. However, my hitting list is similar to everyone else's. My pitching is very different, though; come season's end, in testing my projections are about as accurate as those publicly available. That means I can find treasure in pitching but less so in hitting so I'm never going Kershaw first round. I can find pitching but *need* hitting.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
I'm not against all first-round Kershaw scenarios, just the one where the pitching staff falls apart if he falls apart. I considered Kershaw with the 2nd pick in my ME Event, and if I had taken him, would have likely gone with Archer in the 3rd round anyway (as I did).bjoak wrote: That means I can find treasure in pitching but less so in hitting so I'm never going Kershaw first round. I can find pitching but *need* hitting.
My Kershaw strategy would have been to make pitching the absolute strength of my team. On ERA alone, Kershaw is worth about 1/3 of a run off team ERA and .075 off team Whip. Adding Kerhaw to an otherwise average pitching staff does not create an Overall-competitive team. It might create league-competitive team. Adding Kershaw to a less-than-average pitching staff eliminates that team from Overall prizes.
So for those teams that went Kershaw/Hill/Junk...Dead In Water.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Except, one man's junk...knuckleheads wrote:I'm not against all first-round Kershaw scenarios, just the one where the pitching staff falls apart if he falls apart. I considered Kershaw with the 2nd pick in my ME Event, and if I had taken him, would have likely gone with Archer in the 3rd round anyway (as I did).bjoak wrote: That means I can find treasure in pitching but less so in hitting so I'm never going Kershaw first round. I can find pitching but *need* hitting.
My Kershaw strategy would have been to make pitching the absolute strength of my team. On ERA alone, Kershaw is worth about 1/3 of a run off team ERA and .075 off team Whip. Adding Kerhaw to an otherwise average pitching staff does not create an Overall-competitive team. It might create league-competitive team. Adding Kershaw to a less-than-average pitching staff eliminates that team from Overall prizes.
So for those teams that went Kershaw/Hill/Junk...Dead In Water.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Just thinking on this more... I don't get the hate for Kershaw/Hill. That's maybe 320 innings of amazing pitching. If you draft SPs in two of your first three picks, your offense is very likely dead in the water. In fact, if you draft three with your first ten, same. You need to build some equity on offense because your later picks will tear it down. So, take Kershaw out of the equation and tell me two pitchers who will give you a better start than Kershaw/Hill, one of whom you are not taking in your first five picks.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Baumgarner/Hendricks 2/6. My ME.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
I could be wrong, but I think the overall Main Event winner last year selected 2 SPs (Max and Kluber) with 2 of his first 3 picks.bjoak wrote:Just thinking on this more... I don't get the hate for Kershaw/Hill. That's maybe 320 innings of amazing pitching. If you draft SPs in two of your first three picks, your offense is very likely dead in the water. In fact, if you draft three with your first ten, same. You need to build some equity on offense because your later picks will tear it down. So, take Kershaw out of the equation and tell me two pitchers who will give you a better start than Kershaw/Hill, one of whom you are not taking in your first five picks.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Not better than Hill/Kershaw. Not even much better than Kershaw and a chump. No offense. Those are fine picks, but Kershaw is that good.knuckleheads wrote:Baumgarner/Hendricks 2/6. My ME.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Maybe I was too firm. If you get Trout it's like a first and second round hitter right there. If you happen into Mookie Betts' Troutian season, there's that too. I'm still thinking he didn't go back to the well for a while, though.skmetz51 wrote:I could be wrong, but I think the overall Main Event winner last year selected 2 SPs (Max and Kluber) with 2 of his first 3 picks.bjoak wrote:Just thinking on this more... I don't get the hate for Kershaw/Hill. That's maybe 320 innings of amazing pitching. If you draft SPs in two of your first three picks, your offense is very likely dead in the water. In fact, if you draft three with your first ten, same. You need to build some equity on offense because your later picks will tear it down. So, take Kershaw out of the equation and tell me two pitchers who will give you a better start than Kershaw/Hill, one of whom you are not taking in your first five picks.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Also took two closers in the first ten rounds (well one closer and Glen Perkins). Third starter was in round 13.bjoak wrote:Maybe I was too firm. If you get Trout it's like a first and second round hitter right there. If you happen into Mookie Betts' Troutian season, there's that too. I'm still thinking he didn't go back to the well for a while, though.skmetz51 wrote:I could be wrong, but I think the overall Main Event winner last year selected 2 SPs (Max and Kluber) with 2 of his first 3 picks.bjoak wrote:Just thinking on this more... I don't get the hate for Kershaw/Hill. That's maybe 320 innings of amazing pitching. If you draft SPs in two of your first three picks, your offense is very likely dead in the water. In fact, if you draft three with your first ten, same. You need to build some equity on offense because your later picks will tear it down. So, take Kershaw out of the equation and tell me two pitchers who will give you a better start than Kershaw/Hill, one of whom you are not taking in your first five picks.
But there's no magic formula.
I took Kershaw Monday and didn't follow up with another starter for a long time. But I would have taken another starter much earlier if there had been a starter I liked on the board when I picked. There wasn't so I waited. Could work, I could regret it. Who knows in March.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
UT O. kershaw velocity loss of 2 mph in today's game. where there's smoke, there's usually fire.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
So easy to think of Kershaw as being the past Kershaw. Like the back thing never happened.
Edit- But it didn't stop me from taking him at 1-5
Edit- But it didn't stop me from taking him at 1-5
On my tombstone-
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!
Wait! I never had the perfect draft!
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
A game or two before Kershaw went down last year, ESPN's Sunday Night Baseball spent 10 minutes with cameras tracking Kershaw's pregame routine, fawning over his health and preparation.DOUGHBOYS wrote:So easy to think of Kershaw as being the past Kershaw. Like the back thing never happened.
Edit- But it didn't stop me from taking him at 1-5
Given that lessened certainty of Kershaw's health, there are still valid arguments that he should be the #1 pick.
Re: Clayton Kershaw = Billy Hamilton (So far...)
Last year my 1st rd was realative bust (Harper) and then went Mad Bum Kluber and followed up with Heyward, yet still managed a second place lg finish. Personally I don't think there is a magic formula to win the overall. It really is more of a perfect storm aligning.